HomeFWJ TakeawayTax disputesLegal and Industry UpdatesCOP 9 and serious tax fraud: HMRC’s tougher approach

HMRC continues its tough stance

HMRC’s approach to Code of Practice 9 investigations has hardened noticeably in recent years. What was once viewed by some taxpayers as a relatively contained civil process is now being applied with greater intensity, deeper evidential preparation, and a clearer focus on escalation where cooperation falls short.

For directors and individuals facing a COP 9 investigation, this shift has important implications. The process should no longer be treated as a procedural formality. It is a serious fraud investigation pathway with significant personal and commercial consequences if mishandled.


What COP 9 is designed to achieve

Code of Practice 9 is HMRC’s civil fraud procedure. It is used where HMRC suspects deliberate behaviour that has led to a loss of tax, but is prepared to offer the Contractual Disclosure Facility as an alternative to immediate criminal prosecution.

The offer is conditional. HMRC expects a full, accurate, and complete disclosure of deliberate conduct. In return, and provided the disclosure is truthful and comprehensive, HMRC agrees not to pursue a criminal investigation in relation to the matters disclosed.

This balance between opportunity and risk lies at the heart of COP 9.


How HMRC’s approach has evolved

Recent enforcement trends show that HMRC is now entering COP 9 investigations with a significant body of information already assembled. Third party data, banking material, international information exchange, and historic filings are often reviewed before the process formally begins.

As a result, disclosures are tested rigorously against HMRC’s existing knowledge. Inconsistencies, omissions, or attempts to narrow the scope artificially are more likely to be identified and challenged at an early stage.

There is also a greater willingness to withdraw the civil route altogether where HMRC loses confidence in the taxpayer’s cooperation or credibility.


The risks of poor handling

One of the most significant dangers in a COP 9 investigation is underestimating its reach. Poorly structured disclosures, informal explanations, or a failure to manage privilege can all have lasting consequences.

Where HMRC concludes that a disclosure is incomplete or misleading, the protections offered by the Contractual Disclosure Facility may be lost. This can result in escalation to a criminal investigation, higher penalties for deliberate and concealed behaviour, and wider scrutiny of a director’s conduct.

Once HMRC’s confidence has been undermined, regaining control of the process becomes extremely difficult.


Managing cooperation and self protection

Effective COP 9 strategy requires a careful balance. Cooperation is essential, but it must be controlled, accurate, and legally robust. Over disclosure without structure can be as damaging as under disclosure.

Early professional advice allows disclosures to be properly scoped, factual narratives to be tested, and legal privilege to be preserved where appropriate. It also enables structured engagement with HM Revenue and Customs that demonstrates cooperation without creating unnecessary exposure.

This is particularly important where directors face overlapping risks beyond the tax position, including insolvency consequences or regulatory scrutiny.


Wider consequences beyond tax assessments

COP 9 investigations rarely exist in isolation. Where deliberate conduct is established, the outcome can influence how other bodies view a director’s fitness and behaviour.

The way a COP 9 investigation is handled often shapes subsequent decisions relating to penalties, recovery action, and personal consequences for directors. Early missteps can therefore have effects that extend well beyond the immediate tax dispute.


FWJ takeaway

COP 9 is no longer a narrow civil process. HMRC’s tougher and more evidence led approach means that early, strategic handling is essential. Proper advice helps directors manage cooperation, protect their position, and reduce the risk of escalation into criminal or regulatory action.

Our specialist Code of Practice investigations team is here to help you today. Call us for a free consultation and speak to one of our experts.

Andy Lynch is outstanding. Dealt with an R&D tax query at a time of great stress for me due to a recent bereavement. Clear, calm, practical advice delivered with compassion and action. Quite simply heaven sent. I can’t recommend him highly enough.

A client for whom we successfully assisted in a tax query

Key contacts

Andy Lynch

Andy Lynch

Partner (Non-solicitor)

Stephen Downie

Stephen Downie

Partner

Connor Coombs

Connor Coombs

Paralegal

View full team

Case studies

View all case studies

Contact us in confidence