Allegations of dishonest conduct are serious on many levels - they can often lead to disqualification as a director followed by personal claims by liquidators. And even criminal proceedings. Our brilliant team can help. We have dealt with claims of this nature since 2002. Call us today for assistance.

One of the most astute appointments I have ever made

A company director we successfully defended against disqualification

The Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986 was a piece of legislation introduced to protect the public interest from directors who may otherwise take the benefit of the limited liability status of a company to run a profitable business without paying proper attention to the simultaneous requirement to ensure that such trading does not prejudice stakeholders, including members of the public.

Stakeholders can include

  • fellow directors;
  • government institutions;
  • financial institutions;
  • employees;
  • creditors; and
  • customers.

One of the most common parties to suffer from a company default, or even insolvency, is Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs (“HMRC”) who are often the last to be paid where a company is suffering cash flow problems.

However, director disqualification is primarily for the purpose of protecting the public interest, not punishing the guilty. Accordingly, directors who are banned are often not criminals, but may be merely negligent or even, dare we say it, disorganised (and as a result present a risk to the public as a director of a limited company).

Most commonly, legal proceedings are brought where a company is placed into insolvency proceedings. See a more comprehensive explanation of the most common grounds of misconduct which could merit the banning as a director.

Other circumstances of director disqualification

In addition to disqualification as a result of the company going into insolvency, a director is disqualified where s/he becomes bankrupt.

Outside these circumstances, directors may be banned where they are considered a risk to the public or found liable for criminal offences including where a company is wound-up in the public interest, where a director is found guilty of a criminal offence or where a director/the company have persistently breached the filing requirements of the Companies Act 2006.

However, and potentially far more serious, are circumstances where a director is liable for fraud.

Why disqualify for fraud?

There is a separate and distinct provision within the relevant legislation that permits the Secretary of State to seek the banning of a director if they can be shown to have been involved in acts of fraud while appointed a director of a company and those acts of fraud have led to losses to creditors.

  • this provision is set out separately as a result of the serious concern that fraud presents to the integrity of the UK marketplace, where directors of all limited companies hold a position of trust and fidelity to all parties with whom they deal;
  • while companies are essentially private enterprises set up (in most circumstances) to make a profit for its shareholders, this profit cannot be gained through deception designed solely for the purpose of financial gain without any intention to deliver what is promised.

Consequences of being disqualified for fraud

Where disqualification proceedings are threatened or issued as a result of allegations of fraud, the period of the ban sought will almost always be within the “top bracket”, being a period in excess of 10 years up to the maximum of 15 years.

Fraud is considered extremely serious and, no matter whether a director signs an undertaking or is disqualified in formal legal proceedings, s/he is unlikely to be able to then seek leave / permission to be a director under section 17 of the Company Directors Disqualification Act 1986.

Circumstances of a director ban for fraud

The number of directors banned solely for fraud (although fraud can pervade under many different headings leading to disqualification as a director) are few because of the high threshold required to prove such offences and the evidential burden of proving the fraud.

Fraud generally refers to an abuse of a trusted position and, in respect of legal proceedings, this refers to circumstances of fraudulent trading, where a company’s business is run with the knowledge that a company has no likelihood of avoiding insolvency and with the intent to defraud third parties (usually creditors) during this period.

The common grounds for a director to be disqualified for fraud is in criminal proceedings for fraudulent trading under the Companies Act 2006, although rarely a conviction may not be required and a disqualification claim can be brought on its own.

At Francis Wilks & Jones we are able to advise on any risk you or your business may face as a result of being subject to a disqualification claim for fraud. Please call any member of our disqualification team for a consultation now for help.

Over the ten years we have worked together, FWJ continue to achieve exceptional results year on year. Andy Wilks and the team have been a pleasure to work with and have always provided pragmatic, commercial and accurate advice on a wide range of matters. FWJ have become an integral part of our business and we cannot recommend them highly enough.

A longstanding client whom we have advised on various matters

Case studies

View all case studies

Contact us in confidence