HomeFWJ TakeawayFraud and freezing ordersWorldwide freezing ordersHow do worldwide freezing orders work in fraud and asset recovery cases?

Worldwide freezing orders are one of the strongest tools available in civil fraud and asset recovery. Our commercial litigation Partner Andrew Carter explains how they work and how we can help.

Introduction

Freezing Orders can stop a respondent from moving or hiding assets across multiple jurisdictions, preserve the value of a claim, and prevent dissipation before judgment. Although highly effective, these orders also place significant obligations on both sides. Understanding how they work and when they are appropriate, is essential for anyone involved in a serious commercial dispute or suspected fraud.

At a glance

  • A freezing order prevents a respondent from dealing with assets up to a specified value.
  • Worldwide orders extend that protection to overseas assets, cryptocurrencies and offshore structures.
  • Applications are usually made without notice to the Respondent , but require full and frank disclosure from the Applicant and a cross-undertaking in damages.
  • Proper planning and legal advice is critical. The Courts do not grant these types of orders lightly.

What is a freezing order and when will the court grant one?

Freezing orders area form of interim injunction that prevents a party from disposing of or dealing with assets pending the outcome of an underlying legal claim. The idea is that the order preserves identifiable assets for the Claimant in the event it is successful and wants to enforce a Judgment in the underlying set of legal proceedings.

  • The test requires the applicant to show a good arguable case, solid evidence of a real risk that the respondent will dissipate assets to frustrate enforcement, and that granting the order is just and convenient.
  • For worldwide freezing orders, the court must also be satisfied that the dispute or the respondent has a sufficiently strong connection to England to justify the extra-territorial scope of the relief.
  • In fraud and asset recovery cases, this often arises where funds have been misappropriated, diverted overseas or moved through opaque structures.

A worldwide freezing order does not stop the respondent from moving assets outside the jurisdiction completely, provided that the overall value of their assets does not fall below the maximum amount specified in the order (unless the order is unlimited – which is unusual). They are used where the respondent has international connections or where there is evidence that assets may be moved abroad if no order is made.

As set out above – these orders are serious. They do not give the applicant any rights or proprietary interest over the assets, but they prevent dealings that could undermine enforcement if judgment is later obtained. The court may also freeze company assets where the company is wholly owned and controlled by the respondent, and there is strong evidence that the company is being used as the respondent’s vehicle for holding assets.

How do you obtain a worldwide freezing order?

Most freezing order applications are made without notice to avoid tipping off the respondent. Otherwise if they knew the application was likely, they would just remove any assets beyond the reach of the Claimant.

The applicant must make full and frank disclosure of all matters relevant to the court’s decision, including those that are adverse to their case. Failure to comply with this duty may result in the order being discharged, even if the circumstances would otherwise justify freezing relief.

Applicants must also give a cross-undertaking in damages, meaning they may have to compensate the respondent if the court later finds that the order should not have been granted. This reflects the serious potential impact of freezing injunctions.

The court will consider:

  • the strength of the underlying claim;
  • the nature and location of the assets;
  • indicators of dissipation (e.g., transfers to offshore accounts, rapid withdrawals, restructuring); and
  • whether the order is proportionate.

If granted, the order must be served promptly and correctly  in England and Wales and, where appropriate, overseas.

FWJ Takeaway: Successful applications depend on careful preparation, detailed evidence and compliance with strict disclosure duties. Our brilliant team at FWJ have 25 years’ experience obtaining or defending freezing orders.

What does a freezing order prevent and how does it affect the respondent?

A freezing order does not seize or transfer ownership of assets. Instead, it prevents the respondent from selling, transferring, charging or in any way dealing with them, up to a fixed maximum value. This can include bank accounts, property, investments, shares, business assets and increasingly, digital assets such as cryptocurrency holdings.

  • Respondents are normally required to provide a sworn asset disclosure, setting out the value, location, and detail of all assets above a threshold set by the court (which is normally quite low).
  • This can be burdensome, particularly where assets are held internationally or through complex structures and disclosure is required within a short time frame, often in the space of hours and days. But failure to do this properly can lead to a respondent being in contempt of court and face possible imprisonment. So it is vital legal advice is taken early to avoid falling in to this pitfall.
  • The order may also affect third parties – including banks or professional intermediaries – who must not allow transactions that could result in a breach of the injunction.

Complying with the order is therefore essential. Breach can lead to contempt of court and, in serious cases, imprisonment.

How can a freezing order be enforced across borders?

Worldwide freezing orders rely on cross-border cooperation. While the English court can make an order with global effect, enforcement typically requires recognition in local jurisdictions. This depends on the country involved, the nature of the assets and whether local courts are willing to assist.

Under Section 25 of the Civil Jurisdiction and Judgments Act 1982, English courts can also grant an order in support of foreign proceedings. However, Section 25 relief is discretionary, and the court will consider whether granting the order is expedient and compatible with principles of international comity. Applicants may need parallel orders abroad, assistance from local lawyers or supporting disclosure orders such as Norwich Pharmacal or Bankers Trust relief.

Since the UK is no longer part of the Brussels Recast regime, English freezing orders are not automatically recognised in EU Member States. Recognition depends on each jurisdiction’s private international law rules, and in many cases separate proceedings or further evidence will be required.

It is important to understand the practical limitations: not all jurisdictions enforce foreign freezing orders, and some require separate evidence or local proceedings.

What happens next and how do you protect your position?

After a freezing order is granted, the court will list a return date where both sides are heard.

  • Applicants must be ready to justify the order, while respondents may seek to vary or discharge a freezing order. This early stage can often become highly disputed and protracted – so applicants must go in to these types of cases with their eyes fully open to the potential cost of an application to discharge an order.
  • From there, the case typically proceeds to disclosure, interim applications and trial, or settlement discussions.
  • Procedural requirements, including the format of freezing orders and the steps to be taken at the return date, are set out in court guides such as the Commercial Court Guide and Chancery Guide. These contain mandatory provisions and standard forms that parties must follow.

Claimants should maintain pressure through well-planned enforcement and asset-tracing strategy. Respondents must comply strictly, avoid transactions that could breach the order and take advice on whether variation or discharge is appropriate.

With over 25 years’ experience in civil fraud, freezing orders and asset recovery, our team at FWJ advises both applicants and respondents on obtaining, challenging and managing freezing relief.

FWJ Takeaway: Freezing orders are powerful but complex, both sides should act quickly to protect their interests and avoid costly mistakes.

How our Freezing Order team can help you – today

If you need advice on obtaining, responding to or enforcing a freezing order, our specialist team can guide you through the process and help protect your position. Call our freezing orders team for immediate help today.

Key contacts

Andrew Carter

Andrew Carter

Partner

Maria Koureas-Jones

Maria Koureas-Jones

Partner

Stephen Downie

Stephen Downie

Partner

View full team

Case studies

View all case studies

Contact us in confidence