Being served with an injunction application can be alarming for any business or company director. Injunctions are powerful court orders that can immediately restrict business activity, prevent the use of assets or require urgent action.
However, an injunction is not automatically granted simply because it has been requested. The courts in England & Wales carefully examine whether the order is justified, and defendants have the right to challenge the application or seek to discharge or vary an order that has already been made.
This guide explains how injunction applications arise, how they can be challenged, and what businesses should do if they find themselves facing urgent court proceedings.
What should you do if you receive an injunction application?
If your business receives notice of an injunction application, it is important to act quickly. Injunction proceedings often move rapidly, and the time available to respond may be very limited.
- An injunction application will normally be supported by detailed written evidence and may include a draft court order setting out the restrictions the applicant seeks to impose. The documents will usually explain the legal claim being pursued and the reasons why the applicant says an injunction is necessary.
- The first step is to review the scope of the proposed order carefully. Some injunctions can have significant commercial consequences, particularly if they restrict the use of company assets, prevent business transactions or limit communications with clients or suppliers.
Early legal advice is essential in these situations. A solicitor can review the application, assess the strength of the underlying claim and advise whether the injunction should be opposed, varied or accepted pending further proceedings.
Our team has over 20 years’ exprience dealing with urgent injunction situations and can help you today.
Where the application is being heard on notice, the defendant will usually have the opportunity to present evidence and legal arguments to the court before any order is made.
When can a court refuse or discharge an injunction?
Injunctions are discretionary remedies. This means the court will not grant them automatically, even where a claimant has established a potential legal claim.
The court generally applies the principles established in American Cyanamid v Ethicon Ltd [1975] AC 396, which govern interim injunctions in England and Wales.
- A defendant may challenge an injunction application by arguing that the legal test has not been satisfied. For example, the defendant may argue that there is no serious issue to be tried because the claim has little prospect of success.
- Another common argument is that financial damages would be an adequate remedy if the claimant ultimately succeeds. If the alleged harm can be compensated through a monetary award, the court may conclude that an injunction is unnecessary.
- The court will also consider the balance of convenience. This involves assessing the potential harm to each party if the injunction is granted or refused. If the order would cause disproportionate disruption to the defendant’s business activities, the court may decline to grant it.
Where an injunction has already been granted on an interim basis, the defendant may apply to discharge the order entirely if these requirements have not been satisfied.
How can a defendant challenge a without notice injunction?
In particularly urgent situations, the court may grant an injunction without notice to the defendant. This means the defendant was not informed about the application before the order was made.
- Without notice injunctions are designed for cases where giving advance warning might defeat the purpose of the order. For example, a claimant seeking a freezing injunction may argue that notifying the defendant would allow assets to be moved before the order could take effect.
- Because the defendant has not been present at the initial hearing, the court will normally list a return date shortly after the order is made. This hearing gives the defendant the opportunity to challenge the injunction.
- One of the key obligations placed on claimants in without notice applications is the duty of full and frank disclosure. The applicant must present all relevant facts to the court, including information that may weaken the application.
If the claimant has failed to comply with this duty, the defendant may ask the court to discharge the injunction. Courts take this obligation very seriously, and a failure to disclose material facts can lead to the freezing order being discharged – and a hefty costs order payable by the applicant.
Can an injunction be varied or limited by the court?
Even where an injunction is justified, its terms may still be open to challenge.
Defendants may apply to vary the order if it is too broad, unclear or unnecessarily restrictive. The court has wide powers to amend the terms of an injunction to ensure that it remains proportionate.
For example, a defendant may ask the court to narrow the scope of a restriction that affects legitimate commercial activity. Similarly, an order may need to be clarified if its wording creates uncertainty about what conduct is permitted.
Variation applications can be particularly important in cases involving freezing injunctions or other orders that affect business operations.
The court’s aim is to ensure that the injunction protects the claimant’s legitimate interests without imposing unnecessary or unfair restrictions on the defendant.
What is an undertaking in damages and how can it affect defendants?
When granting an injunction, the court will normally require the claimant to give an undertaking in damages. This undertaking means the claimant agrees to compensate the defendant if the injunction later proves to have been wrongly granted.
- For defendants, this undertaking can provide important protection. If the injunction causes financial loss and the claimant ultimately fails at trial, the defendant may seek compensation under the undertaking.
- In some cases, the court may require the claimant to provide evidence of their financial ability to honour this undertaking before granting the injunction.
Defendants should therefore consider carefully whether losses caused by the injunction could later be recovered through this mechanism.
What are the risks if an injunction is breached?
Once an injunction has been granted, it must be complied with strictly. Breach of an injunction is treated as contempt of court, which can carry serious consequences.
- The court has extensive powers to enforce compliance. These powers may include financial penalties, seizure of assets or, in the most serious cases, imprisonment.
- For businesses, even an inadvertent breach of an injunction can lead to significant legal difficulties. If there is uncertainty about the meaning or scope of an injunction order, it is important to seek legal advice promptly.
In some circumstances, it may be appropriate to apply to the court for clarification or variation of the order.
How injunction defence fits within commercial litigation
Defending an injunction application is often the first stage of a broader commercial dispute. These applications frequently arise in cases involving shareholder disagreements, allegations of breach of fiduciary duties, fraud investigations or disputes between competing businesses.
Because injunctions can have immediate and far-reaching consequences, a prompt and well-prepared response is essential. By carefully analysing the claimant’s evidence and identifying weaknesses in the application, defendants may be able to prevent an injunction from being granted or limit its impact on their business.
Where an injunction has already been made, the law provides several mechanisms for challenging or adjusting the order to ensure that it remains fair and proportionate.
I highly recommend FWJ. Their professional approach, attention to details plus ability to react quickly made the process very swift. I would consider using FWJ again.
A client for whom we achieved a successful outcome
