In this guide we look at how interim orders, such as freezing orders, can help resolve contract disputes
The need for quick intervention in a dispute
Most commercial contract disputes develop over time. However, some situations require immediate legal intervention to prevent serious harm before the dispute can be resolved properly. Interim remedies are designed for those moments.
Interim remedies are urgent court orders intended to protect a business’s position while a dispute is ongoing. They do not decide the final outcome of the case. Instead, they aim to preserve assets, evidence, or the status quo so that the dispute can be resolved fairly and effectively.
This guide explains interim remedies in the context of commercial contract disputes under the law of England and Wales. It is written for business owners and directors who need to understand when urgent court protection may be appropriate, what remedies are available, and the risks involved in seeking them.
Interim court remedies – at a glance
Interim remedies are temporary court orders designed to protect a party’s position during a contract dispute. They are typically used where there is a real risk of serious harm if the court does not intervene quickly.
- Common interim remedies include freezing orders, interim injunctions preventing certain actions, and disclosure orders.
- These remedies are powerful but carry significant legal and commercial risk.
Courts apply strict legal tests to interim applications and expect parties to act responsibly, proportionately, and with full transparency. Early legal advice is essential before seeking urgent relief.
What are interim remedies in a commercial contract dispute?
Interim remedies are orders made by the court on a temporary basis, usually at an early stage of a dispute, before the court has decided the underlying contractual issues.
- Their purpose is protective rather than punitive. Interim remedies are intended to prevent irreparable harm, preserve assets or evidence, and ensure that any final judgment is meaningful.
- In contract disputes, interim remedies are most commonly used where there is concern that one party may take steps that undermine the value of the claim. This may include dissipating assets, breaching restrictive obligations, or destroying evidence.
Because interim remedies can have a significant impact on the party against whom they are granted, courts approach them cautiously and require strict compliance with procedural and evidential requirements.
When do businesses need urgent court protection?
Urgent court protection may be needed where waiting for the normal dispute resolution process would expose a business to serious or irreversible harm.
Examples include situations where
- a counterparty appears to be moving assets out of reach,
- breaching exclusivity or confidentiality obligations, or
- threatening to take steps that would permanently damage the business.
In some cases, the risk arises suddenly, such as when a business becomes aware of imminent asset transfers or unauthorised use of confidential information. In others, the risk develops over time as trust breaks down and conduct escalates.
The key question is whether the harm can be adequately remedied later through damages. If not, interim relief may be appropriate.
What types of interim remedies are available in contract disputes?
The court has wide discretion to grant interim remedies, but the most common forms in commercial contract disputes include:
- freezing orders
- interim injunctions restraining specific conduct
- disclosure and information orders
- orders preserving evidence or property
Each remedy serves a different purpose and carries different risks. Choosing the correct remedy is a strategic decision that depends on the nature of the dispute and the harm feared.
What is a freezing injunction and when is it used?
A freezing injunction, sometimes referred to as a freezing order, prevents a party from dealing with its assets up to a specified value.
In contract disputes, freezing injunctions are typically sought where there is evidence that a defendant may dissipate assets to avoid enforcement of a future judgment. This may include transferring funds offshore, moving assets to related parties, or otherwise placing them beyond reach.
- Freezing injunctions are among the most intrusive interim remedies available.
- As a result, the court applies a demanding legal test. The applicant must show a good arguable case on the merits and solid evidence of a real risk of asset dissipation.
Freezing injunctions are not granted simply because a party owes money. They are reserved for cases where there is a genuine risk of deliberate asset dissipation.
What is an interim injunction and what can it prevent?
Interim injunctions restrain a party from taking certain actions while a dispute is ongoing.
In contract disputes, interim injunctions are commonly used to prevent breaches of restrictive covenants, misuse of confidential information, or termination of contracts in disputed circumstances.
For example, an injunction may prevent a former distributor from soliciting customers, or restrain a business from terminating an agreement where the contractual right to do so is contested.
Interim injunctions aim to preserve the status quo until the dispute can be resolved. They are particularly valuable where ongoing conduct would cause harm that cannot easily be undone.
When can disclosure and information orders be sought?
In some contract disputes, a business may need urgent access to information to understand what has happened or to protect its position.
- The court can order early or targeted disclosure in appropriate cases, particularly where there is a risk that evidence may be destroyed or concealed.
- Disclosure and information orders are also relevant where assets need to be identified, or where a party requires information to comply with other interim remedies, such as freezing injunctions.
As with all interim remedies, the court will balance the need for disclosure against the burden imposed on the responding party.
What legal tests apply to interim remedies?
Interim remedies are discretionary. The court does not grant them automatically, even where a breach is alleged.
The precise legal test depends on the remedy sought, but common elements include:
- whether there is a serious issue to be tried
- whether damages would be an adequate remedy
- where the balance of convenience lies
- whether the applicant has acted promptly
The court will also consider whether the application is proportionate and whether the applicant has come to court with clean hands.
What is the duty of full and frank disclosure?
Many interim remedies, particularly freezing injunctions, are sought without notice to the other party. This means the respondent is not present to defend the application at the initial hearing.
- In such cases, the applicant owes the court a strict duty of full and frank disclosure.
- This requires disclosure of all material facts, including those that may undermine the application.
- Failure to comply with this duty can result in the remedy being discharged and may expose the applicant to adverse cost orders or damages.
This duty is one of the most significant risks associated with interim applications and requires careful preparation.
What are cross-undertakings in damages and why do they matter?
When granting an interim remedy, the court will usually require the applicant to give a cross-undertaking in damages. This is a promise to compensate the respondent for losses suffered if it later turns out that the interim remedy should not have been granted.
Cross-undertakings can expose businesses to significant financial risk. Directors must consider carefully whether the business can meet this potential liability.
Understanding the scope and consequences of a cross-undertaking is essential before seeking interim relief.
How quickly can interim remedies be obtained?
Interim remedies can be obtained very quickly where urgency is established.
In genuine emergencies, applications can be made within hours or days. Courts are accustomed to dealing with urgent commercial applications and can convene hearings at short notice.
However, urgency does not remove the need for proper evidence and preparation. Poorly prepared applications are unlikely to succeed, regardless of urgency.
Prompt action is important. Delay can undermine an application by suggesting that the harm is not truly urgent.
What risks do interim remedies carry for applicants?
Interim remedies are powerful but risky.
If an application fails, the applicant may face adverse cost consequences. If a remedy is granted but later discharged, the applicant may be liable under the cross-undertaking in damages.
There is also reputational and commercial risk. Aggressive interim applications can escalate disputes and damage relationships.
For these reasons, interim remedies should be pursued only where they are genuinely necessary and strategically justified.
How interim remedies affect negotiation and settlement
The availability or grant of interim remedies can significantly influence negotiation dynamics.
- The threat of urgent court action may bring a reluctant counterparty to the table.
- Conversely, the grant of an interim remedy may entrench positions if not handled carefully.
Interim remedies should be viewed as part of a broader dispute strategy, not as an end in themselves. Used appropriately, they can stabilise a situation and create space for resolution.
What should a business do if urgent action is needed?
Where urgent action may be required, businesses should act quickly but carefully.
The first step is to identify the risk and gather evidence. Contracts, correspondence, financial records, and witness evidence may all be relevant.
Early legal advice is critical. Interim remedies require careful judgment, technical compliance, and strategic planning. Missteps can be costly.
Acting promptly and proportionately often preserves options and leads to better outcomes.
Final thoughts from our contract dispute team
Interim remedies play an important role in commercial contract disputes, but they are not routine tools.
They are designed for situations where real harm would occur without immediate court intervention. Used appropriately, they can protect businesses from serious loss and preserve the value of a dispute.
If you are still at the research stage, our Contract Disputes Guide explains the legal framework and dispute resolution options in more detail.
Because of their power and risk, interim remedies should always be approached with caution, clarity, and expert legal support. Our business dispute experts are here to help today.
In an on-going legal battle for three years, your engagement in the latter six months was momentous and rewarding for me. Your excellent work, sharp legal acumen and overriding professionalism was an experience that I should have enjoyed at the outset. I have no reservation in highly recommending your firm and record my heartfelt thanks for your excellent work on my behalf.
A client for whom we provided assistance in a long-term commercial litigation case
