HomeFWJ TakeawayDirector disqualification claimsCommon reasons for disqualificationSection 3 of the Company Director Disqualification Act 1986

There are many grounds which give rise to disqualification as a director - the most common of which by far relate to non payment of taxes to HMRC by the company. But there are other grounds such as persistent breaches of company legislation. Whatever the reason or allegations against you - our team has been successfully defending director disqualification claims since 2002. Let us help you.

I was delighted by the work done by the team at FWJ and cannot recommend them highly enough. Their legal and tactical knowledge was spot on. I can now continue to grow my business free from the worry of my original disqualification

A director we defended against a disqualification claim

Set out below in full is section 3 of the Company Director Disqualification Act 1986 setting out the general provisions relating to director disqualification for persistent breaches of companies legislation.

Disqualification for persistent breaches of companies legislation.

  • The court may made a disqualification order against a person where it appears to it that he has been persistently in default in relation to provisions of the companies legislation requiring any return, account or other document to be filed with, delivered or sent, or notice of any matter to be given, to the registrar of companies.
  • On an application to the court for an order to be made under this section, the fact that a person has been persistently in default in relation to such provisions as are mentioned above may (without prejudice to its proof in any other manner) be conclusively proved by showing that in the 5 years ending with the date of the application he has been adjudged guilty (whether or not on the same occasion) of three or more defaults in relation to those provisions.
  • A person is to be treated under subsection (2) as being adjudged guilty of a default in relation to any provision of that legislation if:
    • he is convicted (whether on indictment or summarily) of an offence consisting in a contravention of or failure to comply with that provision (whether on his own part or on the part of any company), or
    • a default order is made against him, that is to say an order under any of the following provisions
    • section 452 of the Companies Act 2006 (order requiring delivery of company accounts), section 456 of that Act (order requiring preparation of revised accounts),
    • section 1113 of that Act (enforcement of company’s filing obligations)
    • section 41 of the Insolvency Act 1986 (enforcement of receiver’s or manager’s duty to make returns), or
    • section 170 of that Act (corresponding provision for liquidator in winding up), in respect of any such contravention of or failure to comply with that provision (whether on his own part or on the part of any company).
  • In this section “the court” means any court having jurisdiction to wind up any of the companies in relation to which the offence or other default has been or is alleged to have been committed.
  • In this section “the companies legislation” means the Companies Acts and Parts 1 to 7 of the Insolvency Act 1986 (company insolvency and winding up).
  • he maximum period of disqualification under this section is 5 years.

Francis Wilks & Jones is the county’s leading firm of director disqualification solicitors. We are genuine experts in what we do with a combined experience of over 75 years in director disqualification claims. Our knowledge of the Company Director Disqualification Act 1986 is unrivalled. Contact one of our expert solicitors now for your consultation.

FWJ exceeded my expectations by not only avoiding an order for my disqualification as a director but also negotiating a complete withdrawal of the prosecution. This has been such a relief and weight off my mind after many years and I am very grateful to them. I strongly recommend instructing them at the very earliest opportunity. Timely advice, realistic expectations, prioritisation and logical legal presentation were key.

A company director we successfully defended against a director disqualification claim by the Registrar of Companies

Case studies

View all case studies

Contact us in confidence