Close
Our website uses cookies. By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of these cookies. To learn more about how we use the cookies and how you can manage them, please see our cookies policy.
Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (“HMRC”) has the responsibility for not only administering the collection of taxes arising from earnings by all companies and businesses in the UK, but also to police compliance with the necessary tax regulations and prevent the avoidance of tax liabilities and general abuse of the tax rules by way of disguised remuneration.
This role is mainly performed by the following functions:
Of course HMRC’s role is far wider than this, especially when dealing with fraud and the Proceeds of Crime. However, for the purpose of this article we will consider how HMRC enforces payment through civil measures.
Ultimately directors themselves may become personally liable for such liabilities, and we refer to our webpages which deals with potential claims a director may face here.
You may ask yourself – what is the public interest of HMRC closing down a business which otherwise may have continued to pay employees, contribute and pay some taxes (or perhaps all but for historic tax debts) and continue to contribute to the UK economy?
The answer to this is quite simple – by taking such strong action (which may end the life of a company or business) HMRC seeks not only to enforce the liability for the tax debt but also to protect the public from future non-payments.
If there was no policy to procure such payments, everyone would stop paying (or pay less) and further unpaid taxes would continue to accrue as companies and businesses continued to trade using tax receipts to fund the business. The longer term risk to the exchequer, and therefore the public interest, is greater.
It is this enforcement, regardless of the economic benefit of a particular step taken by
HMRC against a particular company or business, that ensures the integrity of the tax system. It is only where trading difficulties, fraud or other unforeseen circumstances arise that enforcement normally becomes necessary.
Enforcement can be proactive, by taking steps to avoid a situation occurring or being repeated, or reactive, by taking steps to enforce payment of the outstanding tax liability.
For HMRC, it is likely not the preferred route to spend endless time (and legal costs) litigating tax claims against companies who may then be placed in an insolvency process (usually liquidation). However, in the absence of an alternative these extreme measures become necessary.
For this reason, HMRC has the following in its armoury to prevent tax losses, procure compliance and enforce payment/prevent further arrears:
At Francis Wilks & Jones we are able to assist with any of the above legal matters arising, whether it be the negotiation of security or payments sought by HMRC or defending proceedings brought against you or your business.
Please call any member of our Tax Disputes Team now for your consultation now on 0207 841 0390. Alternatively email us with your query at info@franciswilksandjones.co.uk and we will call you back at a time convenient for you.